Monica Espitia

The video examines the trial of Lindsay Clancy, a former nurse who admits strangling her three children but has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, arguing that she was experiencing postpartum psychosis. It explores how the case has drawn intense and polarized attention, particularly among women on social media, and renewed scrutiny of shortcomings in the US maternal healthcare system.

Hosts Kai Wright and Carter Sherman explore why abundant modern conveniences—including endless digital entertainment, delivered food, artificial intelligence and GLP-1 medications—can coexist with widespread feelings of emptiness and diminished joy. Academics Michèle Mendelssohn and Charlie Tyson argue that contemporary society represents a form of decadence without pleasure, rooted partly in extreme inequality and a loss of the ability to enjoy experiences fully. They suggest that reclaiming decadence and recovering genuine pleasure could offer a way out of this joyless cultural condition.

Colombia’s newly inaugurated president, Abelardo de la Espriella, is identified as the seventh right-wing Latin American leader to take office since Donald Trump began his second term. Kai Wright speaks with former US ambassador to Panama John Feeley about the region’s shift to the right and how it may advance Trump’s foreign-policy goals, particularly on immigration and efforts to contain China.

A cyclospora parasite outbreak has sickened thousands of people across at least 41 U.S. states. Melody Schreiber and Carter Sherman examine how cuts to the CDC and FDA under Donald Trump have weakened the agencies' ability to investigate and contain the outbreak, including the role of a food supplier and uncertainty surrounding a product recall. The discussion also considers the future of U.S. public health and offers advice on safer food preparation.

The video discusses the 2026 World Cup ahead of the final, focusing on Argentina’s semi-final victory over England, Lionel Messi’s legacy and Argentina’s upcoming final against Spain. Guardian contributors also assess the tournament’s most memorable moments and debate who or what won the competition’s broader cultural “vibes” contest. A correction notes that Vozinha was not recruited via LinkedIn; that story concerned his teammate Roberto “Pico” Lopes.

Two immigrants were recently killed by ICE officers in Texas and Maine, with federal officials claiming self‑defense despite a lack of supporting evidence. Growing public anger reflects a wider pattern of violence tied to Donald Trump’s intensified deportation strategy. Discussion focuses on the circumstances of the killings, the broader record of agency brutality, and possible avenues for accountability.

The discussion covers how recent US supreme court decisions have shaped public life and examines the origins of the court’s power. Elie Mystal outlines why he believes significant reforms are both constitutional and necessary to limit its influence.

Negotiations to end the war in Iran are under way as analysts conclude that the Iranian government currently holds the advantage, raising concerns about future conditions for civilians already facing economic devastation and harsh repression. Journalistic accounts describe how Iranians are enduring the conflict and its social impact, while discussion also addresses the lasting effects of the war on the United States and the losses already experienced by Americans.

A far‑right remigration ideology, now adopted by the Trump administration, seeks to pressure immigrants into leaving the United States. Carter Sherman interviews journalist Paola Ramos about people choosing to depart under these conditions and the implications for the American Dream, as federal agencies publicly support the policy and formalize it through new offices.

Explores how Donald Trump’s presidency is influencing the 2026 World Cup hosted by the US, Mexico and Canada, outlining the ways political changes have altered expectations for the tournament. Jeff Rueter highlights teams to watch, while hosts Kai and Carter share their preferred rooting interests.

The New York Knicks take a 1–0 lead in the NBA finals as they face the San Antonio Spurs and rising star Victor Wembanyama, heightening anticipation for a long‑awaited championship in New York. Despite the vast financial landscape of professional basketball, the matchup is framed as an accessible, people‑centered series. Kai Wright and Andrew Lawrence explore the identities of both teams and the significance of this year’s finals.

The discussion examines rising tensions between the United States and Cuba after the indictment of Raúl Castro, with concerns in Havana about possible US military action. Cuban citizens’ fears and hopes are relayed through perspectives from journalists in Miami and Havana, highlighting uncertainty as both governments escalate rhetoric.

Nationwide access to mail‑order abortion pills has been temporarily upheld by the US supreme court, but legal and political threats continue as the possibility of a near‑total national abortion ban grows. Dr Angel Foster describes how ongoing court battles have disrupted care and heightened uncertainty for patients across the US, outlining the potential consequences for reproductive health if future restrictions advance.

Nationwide access to mail‑order abortion pills has been temporarily preserved by the US Supreme Court, but legal and political threats continue to mount. Experts warn that a near‑total national abortion ban remains possible, and ongoing litigation is already affecting patients across the country. Discussion highlights how advocacy groups and healthcare providers are navigating uncertainty and preparing for potential future restrictions.

US nationwide access to mail‑order abortion pills remains in place following a US supreme court decision, but legal and political threats continue as the prospect of a near‑total national abortion ban looms. Carter Sherman speaks with Dr Angel Foster about how ongoing legal battles are affecting patients across the country and what future restrictions could mean for access to medication abortion.

US nationwide access to mail‑order abortion pills remains intact after a Supreme Court decision, but legal threats continue as a near‑total abortion ban is possible. Carter Sherman speaks with Dr Angel Foster about how the legal battles are affecting patients and what future restrictions could mean for access to medication abortion.

Nationwide access to mail‑order abortion pills remains in place following a US Supreme Court decision, but legal and political challenges continue to threaten their availability. Carter Sherman speaks with Dr Angel Foster about how the court battles are affecting patients across the country and the potential for a near‑total abortion ban, outlining the uncertain future of medication abortion in the United States.

Nationwide access to mail‑order abortion pills remains intact following a US supreme court decision, but legal and political threats continue as the prospect of a near‑total national abortion ban persists. Carter Sherman speaks with Dr Angel Foster about how ongoing legal battles are affecting patients across the United States and what future restrictions could look like.

The Hantavirus outbreak aboard the MV Hondius raised global concern but did not represent a new pandemic threat. The event highlighted weakened US readiness caused by Trump-era public health funding cuts and a pervasive misinformation environment. Melody Schreiber explains how these vulnerabilities could hinder responses to future infectious disease threats.

A discussion examines the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v Callais, which dismantled key protections of the 1965 Voting Rights Act by prohibiting consideration of race in redistricting. Southern states rapidly moved to eliminate majority‑Black districts, creating electoral uncertainty. Stacey Abrams argues the decision fractures communities but maintains that increased voter engagement remains the most effective response.

A US supreme court ruling in Louisiana v Callais that bars states from considering race in redistricting has led several southern states to eliminate majority-Black districts before the midterm elections. Stacey Abrams discusses the resulting disruption and argues for expanding voter engagement despite the setbacks, while the Stateside podcast episode highlights the broader implications for democracy.

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v Callais ended race-based considerations in redistricting, prompting several southern states to eliminate majority Black districts. Stacey Abrams argues that the decision fractures communities and threatens democratic participation, urging expanded voter engagement as the path forward despite the setbacks.

The US Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v Callais struck down race-based considerations in redistricting, prompting several southern states to eliminate majority Black districts and creating turmoil ahead of the midterm elections. Stacey Abrams discusses the consequences of the decision, warning that it fractures communities, while emphasizing that expanding voter participation remains the most effective path forward.

A recent US supreme court ruling in Louisiana v Callais bars states from considering race in redistricting, prompting several southern states to dismantle majority‑Black districts ahead of the midterms. Stacey Abrams discusses the decision’s consequences for marginalized communities and emphasizes the need to strengthen democratic participation despite the setbacks.

A recent US supreme court ruling in Louisiana v Callais eliminating consideration of race in redistricting has led Southern states to dismantle majority-Black districts ahead of the midterms. Stacey Abrams discusses the harmful impact of the decision and argues that increased voter engagement remains essential to countering the disruption and preserving democratic participation.

Stacey Abrams discusses the Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v Callais, describing it as a destructive move that has enabled Southern states to dismantle majority‑Black districts ahead of the midterms. She warns of the impact on communities and argues that increased voter participation remains the most effective response.